Research
Note: A review of
published positions on school reform: a speech from Secretary of Education,
Arne Duncan; Diane Ravitch’s The Death
and Life of the Great American School System; Frederick Hess’s The Same Thing Over and Over; Charles
Payne’s So Much Reform, So Little Change;
Anthony Byrk ad others’ Organizing School
for Improvement; and Valerie Kinloch’s Harlem
On Our Minds. I will review each position in several consecutive blogs.
RayS.
Quote: Arne Duncan,
U.S. Secretary of Education: “At Princeton University, Duncan (2011)
represented the need for public education reform as ‘real and desperately
urgent.’ Seeking to position the entire audience as his allies, Duncan drew
three frames around his remarks, ‘Whether you look at it as a civil rights
issue, as an economic imperative, or as a matter of national security, we have
to get better faster than ever before at education;.’…. He placed the agrarian
calendar, collective bargaining, and small class sizes outside these boundaries
because they hinder desired changes, and he promoted healthy competition, ‘game
changer’ technology, and common standards and assessments because they are ‘a
radical investment, not in the status quo but in transformation.’ The Federal
government’s Race to the Top competition provides government funding as an
incentive for state governments to choose that transformation.” P. 109.
Comment: “Healthy competition” in education is the
Secretary’s suggestion for reform. Keep
reading in the next several blogs for other experts’ views of reform in
education. RayS.
Title: “School Reform
in the United States: Frames and Representations.” Books and Statements
reviewed by Patrick Shannon. Reading
Research Quarterly (January/February/
March 2012), 109-118.
No comments:
Post a Comment