Question: How and why
should we deal with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and/or Transgender(LGBT) literature
in the classroom?
Answer/Quote:
“Recently, scholars have argued for expanding texts in schools to include
children’s and young adult literature with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or
transgender (LGBT) characters and themes, and for including gay readings of
more traditional literature as a means for discussing and countering homophobia
and heterosexism in schools….”
Quote: “Most of these
studies document the use of a single text in a larger unit or several texts in
a single lesson, with the general assumption that all students are heterosexist
if not outright homophobic….”
Quote: “These
conflicting and simultaneous contexts allowed for, provoked, and even demanded
discourses that are neither monolithically liberatory nor oppressive. We
suggest that no single discourse is.
Rather, putting complementary and competing discourses in conversation with each
other around diverse texts and in complex contexts provides opportunities for
conflicts, resulting in ruptures releasing potential and promise for
change.” P. 149.
Comment: If I understand the findings of this
research, discussions of LGBT literature could become a donnybrook. I’m a
professional English teacher, not a psychologist. I'm also not an activist on behalf of causes. If students introduce the
subject, I will concentrate on the writing skills used to express ideas,
without comment on the subject matter, as I will do for most students who write
on controversial subjects. I don’t feel that I can control discussions on most
controversial subjects. Students can write about their opinions, but, for me, I
will stay out of it. RayS.
Title: “Analyzing
Talk in a Long-Term Literature Discussion Group: Ways of Operating Within
LGBT-Inclusive and Queer Discourses.” MV Blackburn and CT Clark Reading Research Quarterly (July/August/September 2011), 222-248.
No comments:
Post a Comment