Answer: “Found that
oral story reading is a significant source of vocabulary learning, even when
the reading does not include teacher’s explanation of word meaning.” WB Elley.
1989. P. 441.
Comment: I always assumed that reading aloud to
children increased vocabulary knowledge. Here’s some research that suggests
that reading aloud to children does increase vocabulary knowledge.
A personal experience: In my first year of teaching in
eleventh grade, I assigned students to read Poe’s short story, “The Pit and the
Pendulum.” I didn’t know much about directed reading assignments or preparing
students for reading assignments at that time, so, I simply assigned them to
read it in class. I had absorbed that
story when I was in high school and I expected the students to enjoy it as much
as I did. They didn’t. Their body language was lifeless. Bored. They closed their books with their
eyes glazed.
I was upset. When I asked them if they liked the story,
there was no response. I changed my question. “Why didn’t you like it?” One
brave student raised his hand and said, “The words were too big.”
“Ok, I said, let’s try another way. I decided to read the
story aloud to them. They read along with me. This time their body language
changed, from slump to alert. They followed along greedily, taking each
successive threat to the protagonist’s life with rapt attention. The class was
ending, so I had to postpone the conclusion until the next day. They left the
classroom buzzing and asking, “How’s this going to end?”
I didn’t know enough at that time to tell them to read it
themselves that night, which would have been a perfect assignment. The next
day, when I finished the story, the students collectively breathed a sigh of
relief. “That was great,” they agreed.
The words were too big for them to read the story silently themselves,
but when I read it aloud, they concentrated on the story and applied the
context to understand the flow of the story. I’m not surprised that the
teachers’ oral reading increases vocabulary.
RayS.
Title: “Annotated
Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English.” Russel K Durst and James
D Marshall, eds. Research in the Teaching
of English (December 1989),
424-442.
No comments:
Post a Comment